Okay, just a quick jot since it’s been a week since I posted anything. But I’m currently getting a big kick out of Sarah Palin’s reaction to David Letterman’s little joke about her daughter getting knocked up.
For those that don’t know (although I don’t know how, since this story’s kinda all over the place) Letterman made a little joke on his show “One awkward moment for Sarah Palin at the Yankee game, during the seventh inning, her daughter was knocked up by Alex Rodriguez.”
Rather kicked off a fuss.
Now the thing is here that Letterman has said the joke was aimed at 18-year-old daughter Bristol. But since he didn’t name anyone in particular in the joke and Palin was with her 14-year-old daughter Willow at the time and not Bristol…
Well, you can see how that might cause a fuss.
Palin said it took Letterman time to think of the “convenient excuse” that he was talking about Bristol instead of Willow. Now, to be fair I think it’s much more likely the joke really was aimed at Bristol and the folks on Letterman’s staff who come up with those jokes for him just didn’t do their homework. Probably got too excited at the prospect of hacking on Palin to be bothered with such things.
PalinPAC spokeswoman Meghan Stapleton said Wednesday, “The Palins have no intention of providing a ratings boost for David Letterman by appearing on his show. Plus, it would be wise to keep Willow away from David Letterman.”
That last comment caused a bit of a stir as well, though Palin largely just shrugged it off. She even inferred that maybe her spokeswoman meant it would be best to keep Willow away from Letterman…for Letterman’s sake. Which I thought was high-larious and was exactly what I would have said as well.
Palin herself has said, “I would like to see him apologize to young women across the country for contributing to kind of that thread that is throughout our culture that makes it sound like it is OK to talk about young girls in that way, where it’s kind of OK, accepted and funny to talk about statutory rape,” she said. “It’s not cool. It’s not funny.”
She also read right from her BlackBerry a comment she received, “Every male organization. . . should rise up and shout in defense of their daughters, their sisters, their mothers.”
I got a real kick out of that one. You never hear feminists say that sort of thing, which I really think is a shame. I’ve always been convinced that if feminists (real feminists, not the current fascist man-hating unshorn lesbo pro-abortion club we call the feminist movement) were to shame men more often on their failure to stand up and defend their daughters, sisters and mothers we would accomplish twice as much as we do. We might even put those other so-called feminists out of business finally.
Men (real men) can’t stand the implication that they haven’t lived up to their real man status and will literally knocked down mountains to defend that. How we could possibly missed this incredibly effect means of rallying the most fanatical support to any particular cause I’ll never understand.
But all in all I find the whole thing just makes me want to stand up and cheer. We never see mothers step up and just go off when their daughters are insulted in this way anymore. I see Letterman making a tasteless joke at the expense of Palin’s daughter (whether 18 year-old Bristol or 14 year-old Willow, both deserve the same general response in my opinion) and Palin pulling out all the stops to just plain make him sorry he opened his big, dumb mouth.
That’s awesome. We really should see that more often.
Now if Bristol and Willow’s dad had come on TV and gone red-faced, bulged a vein or two in his forehead and threatened to call out Letterman to the parking lot I’d probably throw a party. But, as I’ve hopefully implied, we seem to have forgotten who’s job it’s supposed to be to defend our daughters.
Oh, well. Missed the mark but hit the tree.

12 comments
Comments feed for this article
June 13, 2009 at 8:55 am
sukiho
where did the rape part come from, is palin insinuating bristol got pregnant from being raped?
June 13, 2009 at 8:59 am
sukiho
I get it, bristol wasnt raped because she older, interesting way of twisting it
June 13, 2009 at 11:29 am
Grant Dexter
Learn what “statutory” means. It will make your future comments less dumb.
June 13, 2009 at 3:56 pm
sukiho
yeah, your right, In fact Bristol was statutorily raped, I believe, not wanting to research the details, so I guess Palin does in fact think its kind of ok, or are Lettermans words more damaging then the actual dead?
June 13, 2009 at 11:54 pm
contrarymary
Wow. If one could make a career out of missing the point, you’d never go hungry again.
Willow, the daughter that actually accompanied Palin, was 14. So Letterman’s joke involved a 14 year old getting “knocked up” by Alex Rodriguez, who’s 33. That would be the statutory rape Palin was talking about.
Which you’d know if you practiced some reading comprehension. I’m just sayin’.
What exactly did you comment here for? What did you hope to accomplish? In all honesty (and really, I’m being completely honest here) I can’t see that you accomplished anything but making yourself look incapable of understanding what you read. Was this supposed to be some kind of jab at Sarah Palin or something? Maybe mocking the whole idea of anyone being offended at the joke? I’m just not getting what you’re on about.
I’m assuming, of course, you really can read and actually had a point you were trying to make.
June 15, 2009 at 3:49 am
sukiho
the point being, letterman may be tasteless and offensive, but which is worse, bristol getting raped or a joke that may or may not be about willow getting raped?
June 15, 2009 at 7:20 am
contrarymary
That’s not a point, it’s a question. Why don’t answer it for us and make your point?
Maybe you don’t have an answer. Or maybe you’re just not bold enough to offer it, if you do.
But no, I think this is after all just an attempt to mock those offended at the joke. Which pretty much tells me all I need to know about you and your opinion.
What kind of person mocks others because they’re offended at something? A serious question, actually. You should consider it.
(And, again, the comment about statutory rape was intended specifically to make the point that joking about it wasn’t funny. No one has said anything about Bristol and her ex-. It hasn’t even come up. I think you’re a little hung up on the whole idea of it or something and can’t recognize that. So, one more time, the statutory rape referenced would be the one illustrated in the joke involving 14 year old Willow and 33 year old Alex Rodriguez. And the reference was made to establish that joking about that was “not cool” and “not funny”. Has nada to do with Bristol and her bo’.)
June 16, 2009 at 1:02 am
sukiho
oh dear, you are rather inflexible arent you? anyway, here some more examples of outrageous left wing humour you could add to your blog and maybe someone else will comment then that agrees with you and everything will be ok again
(dumbness deleted)
June 16, 2009 at 3:09 am
contrarymary
Inflexible? It’s called sticking to the point, staying on topic, not picking out random words from the text and haring off on a tangent.
You know, making sense.
If you wanted to comment on something other than the topic presented in my blog then by all means do so…on your blog.
But I deleted your link. Because it was just more dumb.
June 16, 2009 at 5:41 pm
Brandon Allen aka Lighthouse
A few things:
sukiho, you’re a moron.
As for David Letterman, my internet has been down since Thursday, so this is the first time I’ve heard about this. And while it was stupid of the writers not to do their homework, it’s odd that Letterman would be the one to take a jab at Bristol, seeing as how he got his wife pregnant before they were married. Bristol should be rebuked for not keeping it in her pants, but not by someone with a log in his eye.
June 16, 2009 at 7:10 pm
contrarymary
Excellant point and one I wish I’d made myself! Thanks, Brandon!
June 17, 2009 at 7:37 am
Brandon Allen aka Lighthouse
I guess I should have said “a couple of things.” Seeing as how I only made two points.